The Jackson 5 - I’ll Be There
A woman should be II things : Carefree & Fabulous
The Jackson 5 - I’ll Be There
“What struck me about the second part of the novel was Addie’s narrative, for she makes an important point about language. When she’s talking about love, as Anse understands it, she says: ‘I knew that the word was like the others; just a shape to fill a lack’ (72). I think that this is stating how language is artificial in that people use words to compensate for what they cannot experience independent of language. I mean, if you take a word like ‘love,’ as in ‘I love you,’ you are using the meanings and associations of the word ‘love’ to describe how you feel about someone. But the word and its meaning have existed (at least on an abstract plane) before you ‘loved’; you didn’t invent the word—it was already there. So you aren’t really choosing a word to describe your feelings; you are constructing how you feel by choosing the word. But the word is just a word, a thing. So, as Addie says, you are using a thing (the word ‘love’) to create an experience because there wouldn’t be an experience without the thing. A good analogy to clarify what I’m saying is that I am using words to ‘fill’ in for my not-very-well-thought-out ideas (my ‘lack’).”
I think that this is an interesting comment that raises a lot of issues about language. If you’re an English major you’ll probably grapple with these as you go on. What is the relationship between the thing and the word? Why do we call a bat a ‘bat’? (And what do you see when I write ‘bat’?) Speaking or writing about emotions complicates the issue: What came first: the emotion or the word? Do words express emotions, or do words limit emotions? There are two general views of language. First, words have power. One of the arguments of feminism, for example, is that men have been dominant in part because they have controlled the language and hence the way we think. Second, words are powerless to express what we mean; we often can’t find the words to say what we mean.”